Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

Qantas loses High Court challenge against illegal job outsourcing

Published 13/09/2023, 11:39 am
© Reuters.  Qantas loses High Court challenge against illegal job outsourcing
QAN
-

The High Court of Australia has unanimously upheld a Federal Court ruling that Qantas illegally outsourced 1,700 ground handler jobs at 10 airports in November 2020.

The ruling exposes the airline to a substantial compensation bill and is a significant victory for the Transport Workers Union (TWU), which was backed by an intervention from Workplace Relations Minister Tony Burke.

TWU's national secretary Michael Kain hailed the judgement as historic. "Qantas workers have made history today," Kaine said. "It has been three years and 20 days since Alan Joyce first announced the decision to outsource these workers and they have not stopped fighting for a moment to ensure justice was served."

TWU calls to overhaul board

The high court decision adds to Qantas's mounting woes, including consumer complaints that have surged by 70% in 2022 due to high rates of cancellations, delays and lost baggage. The union responded by demanding a public apology from Qantas and a complete overhaul of its board, led by chairman Richard Goyder.

“The Joyce regime has been toppled but the airline cannot achieve the reset necessary for its survival under the same board that resided over the largest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history. Richard Goyder cannot make it through another day as chair,” Kaine said.

In their judgement, the high court justices said that although Qantas had "sound commercial reasons for the outsourcing decision", it was also an attempt "to prevent the affected employees from exercising workplace rights".

This ruling intensifies the scrutiny on Qantas, which is already facing a class action for failing to refund flight credits accrued during the pandemic and allegations of hoarding slots at major airports, with the competition regulator seeking penalties of $600 million.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In submissions to the High Court, the TWU had warned that overturning the Federal Court’s decision would have led to "uncertainty" about workplace rights and weakened protections against other forms of discrimination.

Qantas had argued that the outsourcing was a financially necessary step, aiming to save the airline $100 million annually and reduce future expenses on ground handling equipment.

Read more on Proactive Investors AU

Disclaimer

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.