🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

Fitch Revises Outlook on Heritage Bank to Negative; Affirms IDR at 'BBB+'

Published 30/04/2020, 05:14 pm
© Reuters.

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Fitch Ratings-Sydney-April 30: Fitch Ratings has revised the Outlook on Australia-based Heritage Bank Limited's (HBL) Long-Term Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to Negative from Stable and affirmed the IDR at 'BBB+'. At the same time, Fitch downgraded HBL's Tier 2 debt to 'BBB-' from 'BBB' and removed the rating from Under Criteria Observation (UCO). HBL's other ratings have been affirmed. Key Rating Drivers IDRS, VR AND SENIOR DEBT HBL's IDRs are driven by its Viability Rating (VR), reflecting the bank's stable business model and risk appetite that features more conservative underwriting standards relative to broader peers. Fitch believes the rapidly deteriorating operating environment will have a significant impact on the Australian banking sector and poses large downside risks. In particular, we expect asset quality and profitability metrics to weaken materially over the next two years.

Fitch revised the operating environment factor outlook to negative as part of this rating action. This is based on our expectation that GDP growth will decline sharply in 1H20 followed by partial recovery in 3Q20. Under Fitch's base case, a proper recovery in economic growth is not anticipated to begin until the last quarter of 2020, but a weakened labour force will still be a constraint. Under this scenario, we would maintain our operating environment mid-point at 'aa-' and revise the factor outlook back to stable once the recovery was established. However, risks are clearly to the downside and a longer, more protracted downturn and then a shallower recovery will have a more lasting impact on the Australian economy, through lower GDP growth and higher unemployment. Such a scenario would result in a lowering of our operating environment factor mid-point to 'a+'. (For details of the baseline case, see "Fitch Ratings Coronavirus Scenarios: Baseline and Downside Cases" at www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10116778 and "Global Economic Outlook: Crisis Update Late April 2020 - Coronavirus Recession Unparalleled" at www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10119280.) Fitch believes measures aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus will result in a significant economic weakening over the next two years. Historically low interest rates, rising unemployment and impairment charges will directly impact asset quality and earnings. HBL's factor outlooks for asset quality (mid-point of 'a-') and earnings (mid-point of 'bbb') have been revised to negative from stable, to reflect our expectations of weakening metrics and significant downside risks. However, HBL has some buffers at the existing mid-points, which means it would take more than a moderate deterioration before the respective mid-points were lowered.

Asset quality will take some time to show material weakening as measures by authorities and banks, such a repayment holidays, are expected to cushion the immediate impact of the downturn. We expect the non-performing loan ratio will increase substantially once these measures subside as there will be a portion of the customer base still unable to service its loans. HBL's sound underwriting standards and loan book - heavily weighted towards residential mortgages - support overall asset quality but do not eliminate downside risk.

Earnings were already facing pressure before the pandemic from low rates and strong competition. We expect the economic downturn to accelerate this in 2020 and into 2021, with a rise in impairment charges, lower interest rates for longer and slower credit growth adding to the existing pressure. Access to low-cost funding from the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) through a term funding facility and easing of competitive pressures will provide some relief to margin pressure.

HBL's continues to maintain reasonable capitalisation buffers above regulatory requirements and at its current mid-point of 'bbb+'. Fitch believes HBL's capital would be able to withstand a scenario moderately more severe than our base case, however the mid-point or outlook could still be reviewed should signs of a significantly deeper downturn arise. HBL's small size and limited access to new common equity remain as key drawbacks to the bank's capitalisaiton.

Fitch believes HBL's funding and liquidity profile is unlikely to be significantly affected, at least in the short term, due to the dislocation in funding markets. Modest reliance on wholesale funding sources, support from the RBA's facilities and a solid liquidity position should provide support to the mid-point and is reflected in Fitch's stable outlook on the factor.

SUPPORT RATING AND SUPPORT RATING FLOOR HBL's Support Rating and Support Rating Floors reflect Fitch's assessment that while support from the authorities is possible, it cannot be relied upon due to the bank's small market share and low systemic importance.

SUBORDINATED DEBT AND OTHER HYBRID SECURITIES HBL's subordinated debt is rated two notches below its anchor rating, the VR, which is consistent with the base case in Fitch's updated Bank Rating Criteria, published 28 February 2020. The change in the base case under the updated criteria means the ratings on these instruments have been downgraded by a notch to two notches below the anchor rating for loss severity, from one notch under the previous criteria. None of the reasons for maintaining the notching at one below the anchor rating is present. The ratings of these instruments have been removed from UCO. RATING SENSITIVITIES IDRS, VR and SENIOR DEBT Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade: HBL's IDRs and VR would be downgraded if the operating environment deteriorates significantly beyond Fitch's base-case scenario. A large enough downturn could trigger a downgrade of the operating environment mid-point, which could result in a downward revision of some financial profile factor scores

HBL's ratings may also be downgraded, even if the operating environment mid-point is not lowered, if there was a sustained deterioration in the bank's financial metrics, including: - Stage 3 loans/gross loans increasing to above 4%; - Operating profit/risk-weighted assets declining below 1% on a sustained basis; and - Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio falling below 10% without a credible plan to raise it back above this level.

Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade:

HBL's Outlook may be revised to Stable if the economic downturn is broadly in line with our base-case expectations. Under such a scenario, we would expect limited weakening of the bank's financial profile and the core metrics should broadly align with the VR of 'bbb+'.

Positive rating action on HBL's VR and IDRs appears unlikely given the Negative Outlook. It also reflects the bank's moderate franchise and small market share.

SUPPORT RATING Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Negative Rating Action/Downgrade: HBL's Support Rating and Support Rating Floor are sensitive to changes in Fitch's assumptions about the propensity or ability of the Australian sovereign (AAA/Stable) to provide timely support. Negative action on the Support Rating and Support Rating Floor will not directly affect HBL's IDRs, which are driven by its VR. Factors That Could, Individually or Collectively, Lead to Positive Rating Action/Upgrade: Positive action on the Support Rating and Support Rating Floor appears unlikely to affect HBL's IDRs unless the action provided by the sovereign is significant. Best/Worst Case Rating Scenario International scale credit ratings of Financial Institutions issuers have a best-case rating upgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a positive direction) of three notches over a three-year rating horizon; and a worst-case rating downgrade scenario (defined as the 99th percentile of rating transitions, measured in a negative direction) of four notches over three years. The complete span of best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings for all rating categories ranges from 'AAA' to 'D'. Best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings are based on historical performance. For more information about the methodology used to determine sector-specific best- and worst-case scenario credit ratings, visit https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10111579. REFERENCES FOR SUBSTANTIALLY MATERIAL SOURCE CITED AS KEY DRIVER OF RATING The principal sources of information used in the analysis are described in the Applicable Criteria. ESG Considerations The highest level of ESG credit relevance, if present, is a score of 3. This means ESG issues are credit-neutral or have only a minimal credit impact on the entity(ies), either due to their nature or to the way in which they are being managed by the entity(ies). For more information on Fitch's ESG Relevance Scores, visit www.fitchratings.com/esg. Heritage Bank Limited; Long Term Issuer Default Rating; Affirmed; BBB+; RO:Neg ; Short Term Issuer Default Rating; Affirmed; F2 ; Viability Rating; Affirmed; bbb+ ; Support Rating; Affirmed; 5 ; Support Rating Floor; Affirmed; NF ----senior unsecured; Long Term Rating; Affirmed; BBB+ ----subordinated; Long Term Rating; Downgrade; BBB- ----senior unsecured; Short Term Rating; Affirmed; F2 Contacts: Primary Rating Analyst Jack Do, Director +61 2 8256 0355 Fitch Australia Pty Ltd Level 15 77 King Street Sydney NSW 2000 Secondary Rating Analyst Tim Roche, Senior Director +61 2 8256 0310 Committee Chairperson Heakyu Chang, Senior Director +822 3278 8363

Media Relations: Peter Hoflich, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7229, Email: peter.hoflich@thefitchgroup.com; Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7234, Email: leslie.tan@thefitchgroup.com. Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com Applicable Criteria Bank Rating Criteria (pub. 28 Feb 2020) (including rating assumption sensitivity) https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10110041 Additional Disclosures Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form https://www.fitchratings.com/site/dodd-frank-disclosure/10120200 Solicitation Status https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10120200#solicitation Endorsement Status https://www.fitchratings.com/site/pr/10120200#endorsement_status Endorsement Policy https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, THE FOLLOWING HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/RATING-DEFINITIONS-DOCUMENT DETAILS FITCH'S RATING DEFINITIONS FOR EACH RATING SCALE AND RATING CATEGORIES, INCLUDING DEFINITIONS RELATING TO DEFAULT. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2020 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.