Fitch Ratings: Libor Transition May Affect APAC Banks' Competitive Dynamics

(The following statement was released by the rating agency) Related Fitch Ratings Content: Impact of Libor Transition on APAC Banks (https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/10136554) Fitch Ratings-Singapore/Hong Kong/London-22 September 2020: The transition from Libor benchmarks to risk-free rates (RFR) is unlikely to trigger near-term rating changes among banks in APAC, Fitch Ratings says. However, it may over time alter competitive dynamics among banks active in the regional loan market, which could in turn influence our assessment of banks' profiles, funding and profitability in the medium term. Quotes for all five Libor currencies are poised to be discontinued after 2021. Regulators have warned that the deadline for Libor's cessation will not be moved because of the coronavirus pandemic even though managerial attention has been focused on the crisis in 2020. Domestic interbank offered rates and local-currency lending will not be directly affected by the change, except where Libor rates are inputs, including Singapore's swap offered rate, the Philippine interbank reference rate and the Thai baht interest rate fixing. In these instances, the Libor-linked benchmarks are being phased out or replaced. APAC banks' floating-rate loans are most commonly denominated in US dollars, although yen loans also account for a significant share, concentrated mostly in Japan. The amount of lending affected by the Libor transition will be large. APAC banks' US dollar cross-border claims amounted to more than USD5 trillion at end-March 2020, according to data from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). Much of this is likely to be based off floating rates, although loans that mature before end-2021 will not be affected by the transition. Major banks in Australia, Japan, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong - the regional leaders in US dollar syndicated lending - are likely to be the most affected. Cross-border claims data from the BIS similarly point to banks from these markets as the most exposed in concentration terms. Net cross-border claims at end-March accounted for 16%-40% of these markets' system assets, significantly more than other APAC markets, most of which have less than 5%. The Libor transition will also affect regional banks' dollar funding. APAC banks in aggregate had about USD202 billion in US dollar floating-rate bonds and syndicated loans outstanding at end-August 2020, according to Bloomberg data. These liabilities are modest relative to the size of the banks' balance sheets and just over half of them mature before Libor's planned cessation. However, there are notable concentrations of exposure among banks in Australia and particularly Japan. The migration of wholesale funding and lending to Libor replacement rates, which are transaction-based rather than anticipatory, may increase banks' exposure to mismatches in asset-liability maturities, rate reset periods and currencies. Under these circumstances, banks with surplus low-cost dollar liquidity - such as Singaporean and Taiwanese banks - could be better placed to adapt, compared with their dollar-deficient Australian and Japanese peers. We do not expect the short-term impact of the Libor transition on earnings to be sufficiently material to change our assessment of bank profitability. However, the transition could act as a drag on a bank's earnings and profitability if it becomes structurally disadvantageous for the bank's dollar lending competitiveness in the longer term, which could in turn weigh on its standalone Viability Ratings. Readiness for the Libor transition in APAC varies widely across the region and also within each market. A July 2020 survey from the Financial Stability Board highlighted that most APAC-based supervisory bodies have engaged with financial institutions and have a strategy in place to deal with the transition. It remains unclear how robustly banks have engaged with the process in some jurisdictions. However, major banks in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan and Singapore, which are among the most exposed to Libor, also tend to be better prepared. The report "Impact of Libor Transition on APAC Banks" is available at www.fitchratings.com or by clicking the link in this media release. Contact: Willie Tanoto Director, Financial Institutions +65 6796 7219 Fitch Ratings Singapore Pte Ltd. One Raffles Quay South Tower #22-11 Singapore 048583 Monsur Hussain Senior Director, Financial Institutions Research +44 20 3530 1793 Andreas Wilgen Group Credit Officer, Structured Finance +44 20 3530 1171 Duncan Innes-Ker Senior Director, Fitch Wire +852 2263 9993 Media Relations: Leslie Tan, Singapore, Tel: +65 6796 7234, Email: leslie.tan@thefitchgroup.com Wai Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: wailun.wan@thefitchgroup.com The above article originally appeared as a post on the Fitch Wire credit market commentary page. The original article can be accessed at www.fitchratings.com. All opinions expressed are those of Fitch Ratings. ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT SECTION OF THIS SITE. DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS RELEVANT INTERESTS ARE AVAILABLE AT HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/SITE/REGULATORY. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE. Copyright © 2020 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212) 908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitch's factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals, actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent third- party verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of Fitch's ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports, Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed. The information in this report is provided "as is" without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating. Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of 2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution, Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers. For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no. 337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001 Fitch Ratings, Inc. is registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (the "NRSRO"). While certain of the NRSRO's credit rating subsidiaries are listed on Item 3 of Form NRSRO and as such are authorized to issue credit ratings on behalf of the NRSRO (see https://www.fitchratings.com/site/regulatory), other credit rating subsidiaries are not listed on Form NRSRO (the "non-NRSROs") and therefore credit ratings issued by those subsidiaries are not issued on behalf of the NRSRO. However, non-NRSRO personnel may participate in determining credit ratings issued by or on behalf of the NRSRO.