China's Shadow Banking Curbs Cut Lifeline for Local Borrowers

Published 26/01/2018, 08:00 am
© Reuters.  China's Shadow Banking Curbs Cut Lifeline for Local Borrowers
STAN
-

(Bloomberg) -- China’s crackdown on shadow banking is raising concern among bond investors about local borrowers’ ability to make repayments as a record 1.8 trillion yuan ($285 billion) of notes come due this year.

Regulators have stepped up efforts to patch loopholes in off-balance sheet financing in the last couple weeks, moves that will effectively block most fundraising channels for local borrowers. Concern that some local government financing vehicles may not be able to repay debt has helped push up the yield premiums on AAA rated LGFV notes to near the highest in three years.

China has doubled down on steps to cut excessive borrowing, and has zeroed in on risks from local companies that racked up debt for projects like subways, bridges and sewers. The Ministry of Finance also started to tighten scrutiny on public-private partnership projects from the end of last year, making it hard for regional authorities to raise funds from even legitimate sources. Revelations that several local governments inflated economic data may also hurt investor sentiment as a broader bond market rout already pushes up borrowing costs.

“The focus of deleveraging this year will probably be on local governments,” said Li Liuyang, a Shanghai-based analyst at China Merchants Bank Co. “As some regions start to ‘squeeze’ the inflated growth data, there’s a higher risk of defaults in their various forms of borrowings, including bonds, asset management plans and wealth management products.”

Off-balance sheet financing has been used to complement the limited amounts that municipal governments can raise via bond quotas over the last couple years, and has helped fund infrastructure construction.

Amid the recent jitters, sales of LGFV bonds are headed for a second monthly decline. They have plunged to 32 billion yuan so far this month from December’s 130 billion yuan, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

Four years after the first default in publicly-traded bonds onshore, no LGFV note has suffered that fate. That’s prompted investors to continue pricing in implicit government guarantees. Any default will likely trigger a re-valuation of the 6.2 trillion yuan LGFV debt market, along with the 14.7 trillion yuan of municipal bonds, whose issuers are all rated AAA regardless of their fiscal strength.

The Ministry of Finance will dispel financial institutions’ “hallucination” that the central government will bail out local repayment failures, it said last year.

See also: strains are spreading in China’s shadow banking industry

In a joint statement with China’s insurance regulator on Jan. 18, the ministry said local governments can’t use insurers’ funds in ways that disguise their true purpose. The banking watchdog prohibited lenders from extending debt financing for regional authorities or insolvent “zombie companies,” in a notice on Jan. 13.

“The first default is likely to occur following regulatory restrictions on local government guarantees and bailouts,” strategists Becky Liu and Jeffrey Zhang at Standard Chartered (LON:STAN) Plc wrote in a research note last week.

Yunnan State-Owned Capital Operation Co., which has some functions similar to LGFVs, delayed repayments to a trust product. While the company later managed to return the funds, saying the delay was an agreed arrangement, Merchants Bank’s Li said such cases wouldn’t occur if the region hadn’t had any fiscal strains.

Liaoning province, Inner Mongolia autonomous region, and Tianjin Municipality have admitted to inflating local economic data. That highlights oversight problems, and significant falsifications will lead to revisions on government-related entities’ rating, according to a Fitch report.

“One can’t underestimate the refinancing pressure on LGFVs, as it’s become increasingly difficult for non-standardized borrowings and as banks become prudent in lending,” said Liang Shichao, an analyst at CIB Economic Research & Consulting Co. “The latest credit events are damaging investors’ trust in LGFVs, at a pace faster than expected.”

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.