Sign up to create alerts for Instruments,
Economic Events and content by followed authors
Free Sign Up Already have an account? Sign In
Quotes
All Instrument Types
- All Instrument Types
- Indices
- Equities
- ETFs
- Funds
- Commodities
- Currencies
- Crypto
- Bonds
- Certificates
Please try another search
Last Call for Cyber Monday! Save Now on Claim 60% OFF
Morgan Stanley faces $750 million lawsuit over alleged fraudulent practices in rail line deal
Editor
Published Sep 19, 2023 06:34
© Reuters.
On Monday, Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) found itself in the crosshairs of a lawsuit filed by private equity firms Certares Management LLC and Knighthead Capital Management LLC. The firms are seeking at least $750 million in damages, accusing the bank of fraudulent practices related to a credit agreement investment for a luxury high-speed rail line.
The dispute centers on an investment deal for Miami-based Brightline Holdings, which is backed by Fortress Investment Group. Brightline is currently developing a rail line project between Los Angeles and Las Vegas. According to allegations made in the New York state court on Monday, Morgan Stanley unlawfully restructured the deal. Brightline Holdings is also named as a defendant in the litigation.
The plaintiffs claim that Morgan Stanley coaxed them into investing around $280 million in the loan during late 2022 and early 2023. The investment was reportedly underpinned by a "make-whole" clause, promising the investors a guaranteed amount based on future interest if the loan was prepaid.
However, Certares and Knighthead argue that Morgan Stanley misrepresented and concealed certain terms of the deal. They allege these hidden terms were later used to validate a preferred-share issue by a subsidiary of Brightline. The plaintiffs maintain that this issue should have triggered the deal's prepayment make-whole provisions. As such, they are now demanding that Brightline prepay the loan and fulfill the make-whole payments.
The lawsuit suggests that Morgan Stanley's alleged fraudulent conduct was motivated by its desire to secure future lucrative investment-banking business with Brightline Holdings and its private equity owners at Fortress. This could potentially include managing municipal debt transactions for Brightline Holdings, thereby generating substantial fees for Morgan Stanley.
In addition to these accusations, Certares alleges it has faced retaliation from Morgan Stanley due to its objections against the bank's actions. The suit mentions an instance from last month where Morgan Stanley declined to participate in another unrelated financing deal with Certares, citing the ongoing Brightline dispute.
In response to these allegations, Morgan Stanley has expressed its intent to vehemently defend itself and denies the validity of the claims. Brightline Holdings has yet to comment on the issue.
The case, filed as CK Opportunities Fund v. Morgan Stanley, is currently pending in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County (Manhattan).
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
Related Articles
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
Report this comment
I feel that this comment is:
Comment flagged
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.