Tuesday, Jefferies has adjusted its outlook on Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE), a global chemical and specialty materials company. The firm has lowered the price target for Celanese's shares to $155 from the previous $170 while maintaining a Hold rating on the stock.
In a recent statement, the firm noted that after conducting channel checks regarding the acetyl market, it appears additional outages would be necessary to tighten the supply-demand balance. Currently, the market remains loose and is expected to stay that way through the end of the year, barring any unexpected demand surge.
The analyst pointed out that longer-term market dynamics are likely to be influenced by a structural shift towards integrated project additions. This shift is expected to introduce more volatility in the merchant market, particularly as it relates to outages at integrated sites.
Celanese Corporation, with its headquarters in Dallas, Texas, is a leader in the production of differentiated chemistry solutions and specialty materials used in most major industries and consumer applications. Its products, essential to everyday living, are manufactured in North America, Europe, and Asia.
The revised price target of $155 reflects a more cautious view of the current market conditions affecting the chemical sector and Celanese's position within it. The Hold rating suggests that the firm advises investors to maintain their current positions in Celanese stock without increasing or decreasing their holdings significantly at this time.
In other recent news, Celanese Corporation has been grappling with significant production challenges due to supply chain disruptions. The company declared a force majeure, anticipating a 15-20% reduction in the second-quarter production of acetic acid and vinyl acetate monomer. Amid these developments, Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn) revised its price target for Celanese to $160, while BofA Securities lowered its target to $144, due to concerns over increased unit costs and reduced margins. Citi maintained a Neutral rating on Celanese shares with a $167 price target.
Analysts from BMO Capital Markets, RBC Capital, and Baird also updated their outlook, with price targets raised to $158, $176, and $180 respectively. These adjustments reflect expectations of the company's resilience and potential for growth despite current challenges. Despite these difficulties, Celanese maintains its fiscal year 2024 guidance, with an EPS forecast of $11-12 and a second-quarter guidance set at $2.60-3.00 EPS.
InvestingPro Insights
As investors consider Jefferies' revised outlook on Celanese Corporation, real-time data from InvestingPro provides additional context. The company's market capitalization stands at $15.19 billion, with a notably low P/E ratio of 7.6, indicating that the stock may be undervalued relative to its earnings. Furthermore, Celanese has demonstrated consistent profitability, with a gross profit margin of 23.61% over the last twelve months as of Q1 2024. This financial health is underlined by a solid dividend history, as the company has raised its dividend for 14 consecutive years and maintained payments for 20 consecutive years.
InvestingPro Tips suggest that Celanese is currently trading at a low P/E ratio relative to near-term earnings growth, which could attract value investors. Additionally, the stock's low price volatility and a strong free cash flow yield are characteristics that might appeal to conservative investors looking for stable returns. For those seeking a deeper analysis, InvestingPro offers a wealth of further insights; for instance, there are 7 additional tips available for Celanese, which can be accessed by subscribing to the service. Interested readers can use the coupon code PRONEWS24 to get an additional 10% off a yearly or biyearly Pro and Pro+ subscription.
While the overall market for Celanese's products may face challenges, as noted by Jefferies, the company's financial metrics and the InvestingPro Tips suggest that Celanese may have the resilience to weather market volatility. As always, investors should consider a comprehensive range of factors in their decision-making process.
This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.