🐂 Not all bull runs are created equal. November’s AI picks include 5 stocks up +20% eachUnlock Stocks

CORRECTED-Australia's richest woman defends bid for cattle empire

Published 25/10/2016, 10:57 am
© Reuters.  CORRECTED-Australia's richest woman defends bid for cattle empire

(Corrects price of BBHO bid from A$385 million to A$386 million in third paragraph)

By Tom Westbrook

SYDNEY, Oct 25 (Reuters) - Australia's richest woman Gina Rinehart on Tuesday defended her joint bid with China's Shanghai CRED Real Estate for the nation's biggest cattle empire, after it was trumped by a rival all-Australian syndicate.

Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting issued a statement detailing the virtues of her A$365 million ($278 million) offer with Shanghai CRED for S. Kidman and Co, hoping to counter any concerns about foreign ownership.

Kidman Managing Director Greg Campbell said Hancock remains the preferred bidder and has the right to match any rival offers, but added the A$386 million BBHO offer would be fairly evaluated once fully lodged.

"It will be a balancing act of sentiment and history and price in the minds of the shareholders," he told Reuters by phone.

The sale of Kidman, which has an average beef herd carrying capacity of 185,000 cattle and grazing rights to a South Korea-sized swathe of land, is under the microscope amid Australia's increasingly protective stance against foreign takeovers in its agricultural sector.

Domestic ownership of agriculture, seen as crucial for the country to cash in on global food demand and to keep tax revenues onshore, has become a hot political issue. The BBHO bid has the advantage of not needing approval from Australia's foreign investment review board.

"The Hancock JV bid is an Australian bid, you don't get much more Australian than fourth generation Australian Gina Rinehart, so let's not start to pretend otherwise," Hancock Chief Executive Garry Korte said in the statement.

"The real difference between the bids is that we will maintain and secure the future of the Kidman legacy, invest in the stations and avoid seeing it split up and destroyed."

That contrasts with the BBHO bid, comprised of the Brinkworth, Buntine, Harris and Oldfield wealthy grazier families, which plans to break up the Kidman lands to share between them. Rinehart-CRED bid excludes two large defence-sensitive Kidman properties, Anna Creek and The Peake, which are adjacent to a government weapons-testing range. A Rinehart spokeswoman, Sophie Mirabella, said on Monday that exclusion and a "break-fee" of A$3.8 million if Kidman ditches the Rinehart-CRED bid leaves the duelling bids valued "about the same". Australian government has twice rejected foreign offers for Kidman, including a previous bid by Shanghai CRED and China's Hunan Dakang Pasture Farming Co Ltd 002505.SZ that had a minority Australian interest.

The BBHO proposal would keep the 100-year-old Kidman name for marketing purposes but split up the vast properties, with various pieces to be absorbed in to the bidding families' existing cattle runs.

($1 = 1.3137 Australian dollars)

(Editing by Jane Wardell and Tom Brown)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.