Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

June OPEC+ Meeting: Where Next For Oil Production Policy, Saudi-Russia Rift?

By Ellen Wald, PhDCommoditiesMay 28, 2020 19:26
au.investing.com/analysis/june-opec-meeting-where-next-for-oil-production-policy-saudirussia-rift-200436358
June OPEC+ Meeting: Where Next For Oil Production Policy, Saudi-Russia Rift?
By Ellen Wald, PhD   |  May 28, 2020 19:26
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

It’s been almost seven weeks since the so-called “historic” OPEC+ production cut deal, and OPEC+ is gearing up for another meeting on June 9 and 10.

On April 12, OPEC+ members agreed to slash 9.7 million bpd of oil production in May and June. Since then, oil production from most of the group’s largest producers—Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Nigeria, Kazakhstan and Russia—has dropped. (Iraq, which committed to cut 1 million of its 4 million bpd production, has only implemented a fraction of what it agreed to).

Oil production from non-OPEC+ producers has also declined, most notably from the United States, where an estimated 2.3 million bpd has come off the market since production peaked at 13.2 million bpd in March.

Nevertheless, after this most recent deal, oil prices sank further. They have only recently started to climb above April levels. In fact, the price of Brent has had a net gain of just about $4 per barrel since April 12. So, despite some of the self-congratulations, that agreement was not wildly successful if raising prices was the goal. The April deal only helped to slow the free-fall that resulted from a failed meeting in March.

Bent Daily Chart
Bent Daily Chart

On June 10, OPEC+ will meet virtually to assess progress on the 9.7 million bpd of cuts. (OPEC will hold its regular ministerial meeting the day before on June 9, likely also via web conference). The April 12 agreement included a planned increase—yes, an increase—of production by a collective 2 million bpd starting July 1. However, action taken at the June 10 meeting could supersede this arrangement if the group decides that “further action is needed to balance the market.”

So, the question is whether OPEC+ will proceed with its plan to expand production, extend the current production levels or try to implement further cuts. The status quo calls for a July increase.

(Recall that Saudi Arabia, UAE and Kuwait also committed together to 1.8 million bpd in extra production cuts for the month of June. These June cuts are in addition to the OPEC+-required cuts. However, it remains to be seen if these cuts will be implemented).

The meeting is just under 2 weeks away, but it is already shaping up similarly to the disastrous March meeting. The March gathering resulted in a rift between Russia and Saudi Arabia (and the “price war” that wasn’t actually a price war).

Recall that at the end of February, Russia signaled its unwillingness to make deeper cuts at the March OPEC+ meeting, but Saudi Arabia insisted on pushing for more extensive cuts anyway. The meeting broke down, and Saudi Arabia then tried to out-pump Russia—a strategy that caused prices to fall by 30%.

WTI Crude Futures Daily Chart
WTI Crude Futures Daily Chart

This week, Russia signaled that it supports the plan to increase production starting July 1. Reporting from Bloomberg indicates that Saudi Arabia disagrees and does not support lifting production, but instead wants to extend the current cuts.

Another public spat between Saudi Arabia and Russia would be disastrous for oil prices. Brent is still $10 shy of its March 5 close and anything but an amiable OPEC+ meeting would likely reverse what small gains have been made since the dispute was resolved on April 12.

However, it seems that Saudi Arabia may be taking pains not to repeat its prior missteps. At the March OPEC+ meeting, Saudi Arabia insisted on putting an additional 1.5 million bpd of cuts on the table even though it knew Russia didn’t even want to extend the cuts already in place.

This time, Saudi Arabia hasn’t made its position officially known. After news broke that Russia—at the least at this juncture—wants to increase production, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman called Russian President Vladimir Putin. Russia released a statement about that call confirming that the two parties agreed to continue “close coordination” on oil production policy.

This call does not mean that Russia and Saudi Arabia are on the same page about oil production, but it does reveal that this time Saudi Arabia is prioritizing Russia’s cooperation with OPEC+. Whereas back in March, Saudi Arabia was willing to gamble that it could maximize its own oil production to increase revenue, it no longer feels confident in such a strategy when the oil markets are nervous. In other words, Saudi Arabia is signaling a willingness to do much more—including shouldering even more production cut burden and losing out on sales to Asia—just to keep OPEC+ intact and the markets happy.

June OPEC+ Meeting: Where Next For Oil Production Policy, Saudi-Russia Rift?
 

Related Articles

Greg Peel
Uranium Week: No Rebound By Greg Peel - Dec 14, 2021

Financial markets around the globe enjoyed swift rebounds last week from the prior week’s omicron scare, but not the uranium spot market. -Uranium spot price ticks down...

June OPEC+ Meeting: Where Next For Oil Production Policy, Saudi-Russia Rift?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email