Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Has China Been Selling T-Bills?

By Marc ChandlerBondsAug 28, 2015 03:08
au.investing.com/analysis/has-china-been-selling-t-bills-1603
Has China Been Selling T-Bills?
By Marc Chandler   |  Aug 28, 2015 03:08
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
 
EUR/USD
+0.17%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
DJI
+0.10%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
USD/CNY
-0.28%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
DX
-0.24%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
CL
-1.08%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
US10Y...
-0.33%
Add to/Remove from a Portfolio
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

The US 10-year Treasury yield has risen 30 bp since Monday's low-water mark. There are a number of reports that try to link the backing up in US yields to purported sales by China. The Chinese sales, in turn, are linked to its efforts to stem the yuan's decline.

China may indeed have sold Treasuries. Bill Gross at Janus apparently suggested as much in a tweet he sent earlier this week. Reporters have been keen to follow the lead. Some media accounts indicate that China had notified US officials of its intentions.

Many have been primed for such a move -- prior to this week. China's reserves have fallen. It owns a lot of Treasuries. Therefore, it follows that China likely sold Treasuries. However, the situation is more complicated. For example, the dollar value of China's reserves fell by $113 bln in Q1 and another $37 bln in Q2. According to the US TIC data, China's Treasury holdings rose by $17 bln in Q1 and another $10 bln in Q2.

Reporters, following the lead of a couple of analysts, argue that China is operating in other centers that the TIC data does not fairly attribute to China. But to make their numbers work, for example, they assume all the decline in Belgium's holdings (Euroclear) are a result of China. That leap is unwarranted. There are other pools of capital that use financial centers like Belgium and Switzerland for financial transactions. Some Middle East oil producers, for example, have also reported declines in reserves.

There are two forces that can help explain at least part of the decline in China's reserves. The first and most important, which is often left out, is valuation. It's not fair to discuss the change in China's reserves without adjusting for valuation.

Consider a thought experiment we have presented before. Since the end of H1 14, the dollar value of China's reserves have fallen by $342 bln. The precise composition of China's reserves are not known. It is assumed that about a quarter of the reserves are in dollars. For the sake of the argument, let's assume that China had $4 trillion of reserves, of which a quarter were in euro-denominated assets. As of the end of July, the euro had fallen roughly 20% since the end of H1 14. That valuation of the euro alone could account for nearly 2/3 of the decline in China's reserves.

The second adjustment in China's reserves that few accounts attempt to incorporate is the official indication that some reserves have been transferred to other parts of the government, including the development bank and the export-import bank. Admittedly, exactly how China is accounting for this is opaque, but to ignore it entirely just doesn't seem.

Of course, there is still room in the data for China to have sold Treasuries, but one has to more than tease the data and, as we know, sufficiently tortured data will admit to anything. The latest claims of China's Treasury selling are too recent to be picked up in the TIC data (only through June) and China's reserve figures (through July). Yet there seems to be a more convincing explanation to explain the 30-bp rise in the 10-year US Treasury yield in recent days.

First, as we argued last weekend and at the start of this week, the global capital markets had an exaggerated response to macro-economic developments and, in particular, what has thus far been a minor depreciation of the yuan -- leaving it slightly less strong but hardly weak. The 10-year yield spiked to 1.90% as part of that exaggeration. Recall that the Dow Jones Industrials posted a 1000-point loss on Monday. Although some reports confused a short-covering rally in the euro with safe-haven demand (there is a difference between reducing shorts and expanding longs, which many accounts seem to gloss over), US Treasuries were the time-tested safe haven. As the panic subsided, so did the demand for Treasuries.

Second, speculators in the futures market likely sold into the rally. On August 11, the same day that China devalued the yuan, speculators had held 500k gross long 10-year Treasury futures (each contract has a notional value of $100k). That was the most since 2008. In the following week (ending August 18), 46k contracts were liquidated, which was the largest in three months.

Speculators had been net short US 10-year Treasury futures since last September. They switched to a new long position in mid July as the 2.50% threshold remained intact. However, they seemed eager to sell into the bond-market rally. New data for the week through August 25 will be published tomorrow.

Third, the economic data shows that there has been little immediate impact on the US economy from the first drop in Chinese stocks and then from the yuan's depreciation. Of course, it is only prudent to recognize the possibility of economic and financial lags. The price of money, after all, adjusts much quicker than the price of goods and services. Nevertheless, all else being equal, the strength of some recent data, leading to expectations that Q2 GDP would be revised up (it was and by more than expected), coupled with signs of a pickup in US consumption and business investment likely would have produced some selling pressure on US Treasuries regardless of what was happening in Beijing.

The US 10-year yield is back above its 200-day moving average (~2.13%). A close today above 2.16% would be the second-consecutive close above the 20-day moving average, which hasn't happened in more than a month. Tomorrow's PCE and deflator data bear watching, but the next key report is August's jobs data. And ADP may steal some of the thunder from the national report.

However, barring a significant miss (and the August jobs report is often later revised higher), international developments and stability of the financial markets may b more important. With some banks now joining Summers and Dalio apparently advocating QEIV, a move above 2.25% is difficult to envision until the jobs report, even if China has sold some Treasuries.

Original Post

Has China Been Selling T-Bills?
 

Related Articles

ING Economic and Financial Analysis
Rates Outlook 2023: Belt Up, We’re Going Down By ING Economic and Financial Analysis - Nov 11, 2022

Bond market returns for 2022 have been horrific, right along the credit curve. For 2023, returns will be helped by a higher starting running yield and subsequent falls in market...

Has China Been Selling T-Bills?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email