Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Fed Watch: Policymakers Wake Up To Inflation Threat, But Is It Too Late?

By Investing.com (Darrell Delamaide/Investing.com)Market OverviewJan 17, 2022 20:25
au.investing.com/analysis/fed-watch-policymakers-wake-up-to-inflation-threat-but-is-it-too-late-200497209
Fed Watch: Policymakers Wake Up To Inflation Threat, But Is It Too Late?
By Investing.com (Darrell Delamaide/Investing.com)   |  Jan 17, 2022 20:25
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 

Federal Reserve policymakers seem to have discovered religion, at least when it comes to inflation, after dragging their feet for months claiming it was transitory. But it may be too late.

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell called inflation a “severe threat” to economic recovery as he was peppered with questions during his confirmation hearing for a second term Tuesday. After long claiming the Fed had to maintain monetary accommodation to support the recovery, he now says the economy no longer needs emergency support.

Fed Governor Lael Brainard, who appeared before the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday for her confirmation as vice chair, said

“We do have a powerful tool” to curb inflation—namely, higher interest rates. After opposing any move to tighten monetary policy for years, Brainard told the committee that fighting inflation is the Fed’s “most important task.”

Powell May Have Missed The Boat

Powell, too, has maintained that the Fed knows how to contain inflation and will use its tools to do so when necessary.

But skepticism is growing that raising interest rates to quell demand will be ineffective at this point in fixing inflation caused by insufficient supply of labor and other resources. The damage is already done on the demand front through inflating the money supply and flooding consumers with aid in pandemic programs.

Powell is still not on board with reducing the high level of monetary accommodation, telling senators that he thinks the Fed can keep its inflated balance sheet intact and not start running off its bond holdings until “later” in the year. Even if the Fed stops adding to its holdings with new bond purchases, it will continue to reinvest maturing bonds in the nearly $9 trillion portfolio.

Richard Shelby, a Republican senator from Alabama who chaired the banking committee for years, said the Fed had “missed the boat” and needed to step in with measures against inflation much sooner. He added that the Fed, in his view, “has lost a lot of credibility” from Powell’s delay.

A veritable chorus of speeches and interviews echoed Powell and Brainard as other members of the Federal Open Market Committee chimed in on their readiness to tighten monetary policy this year to provide a so-called “soft landing” for the economy—taming inflation without a recession.

The hawkish St. Louis Fed chief James Bullard, for instance, said in an interview that he thinks the FOMC will have to move aggressively to fight inflation, raising rates four times this year, starting in March.

Another hawk, Kansas City Fed President Esther George, says the central bank should move much more quickly to run off its bond holdings, and begin even as it is raising interest rates.

But economists around the world are saying that everything from Chinese lockdowns to green energy policies will exacerbate the supply-chain crisis, while labor shortages will fuel inflation for many months.

The former head of the New York Fed, William Dudley, said last week that the Fed under Powell has made four crucial mistakes—shifting policy to allow overshooting of the 2% inflation target until the economy was already overheating, misjudging the strength of the labor market, considering inflation to be transitory, and holding off from reducing bond purchases for fear of another taper tantrum.

“I think the problem right now is that the markets aren’t taking them seriously enough,” Dudley said in an op-ed for Bloomberg.

Fed Board Nominees Chime In

President Joe Biden’s slate of nominees for the Fed board of governors isn’t likely to encourage market participants to think that the central bank is laser-focused on inflation.

Sarah Bloom Raskin, the nominee for vice chair for regulation, has made no secret of the fact that she thinks the Fed should be pressuring banks to allocate capital in line with reducing carbon emissions.

Pennsylvania Republican Senator Pat Toomey has been outspoken in opposing central bank intervention on climate, saying that is not part of the Fed’s mandate, and last week said he has “serious concerns” about Raskin’s nomination for that reason.

The two other nominees to the board, academics Lisa Cook and Philip Jefferson, while bringing an overdue minority perspective on Fed deliberations, have been involved in the Minneapolis Fed’s diversity institute. Toomey again has opposed the regional bank’s emphasis on diversity as being beyond the scope of the Fed’s mandate.

Toomey and Shelby are not likely to derail the effort to evolve Fed policy but their misgivings may be shared by investors who would prefer for the Fed to keep its eye on the ball.

Fed Watch: Policymakers Wake Up To Inflation Threat, But Is It Too Late?
 

Related Articles

David Bassanese
Recession Watch By David Bassanese - May 23, 2022

Global markets Global equities weakened further last week, although not due to another surge in bond yields. Rather, it was due to signs of a weakening in corporate earnings from...

Chris Becker
23.05.22 Macro Morning By Chris Becker - May 23, 2022

While there was a sea of green across Australian politics on Saturday, Friday night saw Wall Street put in a deep intrasession loss that was then barely filled at the end of the...

Fed Watch: Policymakers Wake Up To Inflation Threat, But Is It Too Late?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email