Breaking News
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Column: Forget the 1970s, 'stagflation' playbook may be 2005

EconomyOct 14, 2021 01:39
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. Traders work on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York City, U.S., October 12, 2021. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

(Clarifies paragraph 2)

By Jamie McGeever

ORLANDO, Fla. (Reuters) - With prices rising and economic growth slowing, many investors are looking to the past in a bid to divine where U.S. markets might be headed next. While the "stagflation" of the 1970s brings back memories, investors may want to revisit the mid-2000s instead.

     In both periods energy prices, inflation expectations and bond yields rose, alongside anemic growth and central banks moving toward tighter monetary policy. The mid-2000s were, however, far milder.

    While all economic and market cycles are unique - none more so than the last 18 COVID months of recession, rebound and inflation caused by supply bottlenecks and shortages - the conditions that exist today are more akin to the ones that occurred in 2005.

    Like 2005, U.S. equity valuations are now gently falling. The S&P 12-month forward price/earnings ratio is now around 20.5, down from over 23 a year ago, mirroring the decline to 14 from 16 over the course of 2005.

    That downward drift continued into 2006. Given that P/E ratios are still historically high, there is every reason to expect this trend extending into next year, and potentially accelerating if guidance from third-quarter earnings is gloomy.

    The S&P 500 experienced two mini-corrections in 2005, the first of 8% in March-April and then a 6% drawdown in September-October. The index just had its first 5% fall in almost a year and, according to nearly two-thirds of more than 600 market professionals recently surveyed by Deutsche Bank (DE:DBKGn), a 5% to 10% correction by year-end is in the cards.

    Some analysts have started to point to the mid-2000s as a possible case study. Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS)'s Andrew Sheets wrote in a note on Sunday that 2005 was "an interesting, recent example of a stagflation scare after a mid-cycle transition."


    In some key respects, the inflation picture is more akin to 2005 than the 1970s, too.

    Headline annual inflation is now just above 5%, the highest in 13 years, compared with a peak of just below 5%, a then 14-year high. There is no sign of the double-digit prints from the mid- and late 70s, a period of a serious wage-price spiral.

    Inflation of the 1970s is rightly associated with energy shocks and shortages. But in the mid-2000s notable increases in oil and natural gas prices occurred and were key drivers behind the broader rise in consumer prices. Just like today.

    Brent crude more than doubled to $65 a barrel by the end of 2005 from around $30 at the beginning of 2004. It has more than doubled in the last 18 months to $83 a barrel, and will test $100, according to a majority view in the Deutsche Bank survey of investors.

    U.S. natural gas futures recently hit a 12-year high above $5.565 per million British thermal units after a near-40% spike in just six weeks. In July-August 2005, natgas prices surged around 50% to a still record high, just shy of $14/mmBtu.

    There's no doubt investors and policymakers must be vigilant as inflation expectations measured by breakevens rise across the curve toward May's multi-year peaks. For the U.S. 5-year rate, that's around 2.80%, and the last time it was above that level for more than a few days was in 2005.

    Call it calm or complacency, but Wall Street appears relatively relaxed. The VIX index of implied volatility on the S&P 500 has mostly traded below 20 since March, suggesting equity markets are broadly comfortable with expected higher future levels of inflation, interest rates and bond yields.

    As Morgan Stanley's Sheets points out, inflation markets imply that price pressures will moderate over time, rather than spiral. In addition, nominal interest rates are low, and equity valuations are near all-time highs.

    In the 1970s, the opposite of all that held true.

    "If 'stagflation' means 'the 1970s,' a time of wage-price spirals and high unemployment, this clearly isn't it," he said.

Column: Forget the 1970s, 'stagflation' playbook may be 2005

Related Articles

Dollar dips, while sterling, NZ dollar gain
Dollar dips, while sterling, NZ dollar gain By Reuters - Oct 20, 2021

By Karen Brettell NEW YORK (Reuters) - The dollar pared losses on Tuesday as Treasury yields climbed but remained lower on the day as other currencies, including sterling, were...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email