Black Friday is Now! Don’t miss out on up to 60% OFF InvestingProCLAIM SALE

Trump Shoves Aside Deficit Worries in Debt Deal With Pelosi

Published 23/07/2019, 11:33 pm
Trump Shoves Aside Deficit Worries in Debt Deal With Pelosi

(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump has once again shoved aside past Republican orthodoxy on debt and spending as he announced a budget deal with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that likely ushers in a return to trillion-dollar deficits.

Trump once said he would eliminate the $22 trillion federal debt, but the annual budget deficit is on track to top $1 trillion a year -- swollen by bipartisan spending increases and his tax cuts -- with no real expectation of a change in trajectory any time soon.

The deal, which still must clear Congress, ends the automatic budget cuts enacted as a result of a showdown over the debt limit in 2011, when the new Republican majority in the House held federal borrowing authority hostage until President Barack Obama agreed to a spending straitjacket.

The automatic spending cuts known as the sequester were intended to provide an incentive to cut a bipartisan grand bargain on reducing the national debt, but those efforts were buried long ago.

Under the terms of the agreement, Republicans managed to secure $738 billion in defense spending for 2020 and $741 billion for 2021, including funds for overseas operations that aren’t subject to budget caps, while Democrats got $632 billion in 2020 and $635 billion in 2021 for domestic spending. That amounts to $320 billion boost in spending over two years compared to lower budget caps that would have slashed spending at the end of this year.

Trump has given a nod to budget cutting, but since taking office he’s mostly cowed Republican deficit hawks into silence by prioritizing funding the Defense Department and cutting taxes.

Pelosi, meanwhile, has maneuvered to increase spending on domestic discretionary programs by more than $100 billion since Trump took office.

Incentives

Both sides have political incentives to let the federal dollars flow.

For a Republican president whose focus has shifted to his re-election bid, the deal helps safeguard his strongest asset: the roaring U.S. economy. With this deal, market concerns about the government hitting the debt ceiling will be delayed until well past the 2020 election, as would any threat of automatic spending cuts at the end of this year that might crimp growth.

Trump has proposed huge spending cuts in each of his budgets -- which were largely ignored by lawmakers of both parties -- and this deal shelves any effort at belt-tightening until Trump’s second term or a Democratic president takes office.

The president is already touting the fact that the deal would bring record defense spending, something that appeals to defense hawks in his party.

“I think the president realizes that he’s not going to sacrifice the security of this nation to please a few people,” said Senate Appropriations Chairman Richard Shelby, an Alabama Republican. Shelby noted the GOP needs Democratic votes to pass the budget deal and they won’t support cutting social programs.

Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas called the outlines of the deal “not ideal” but said it would be worse to not fund the government or Defense.

“Obviously you’ve got to pay a certain amount of ransom,” Cornyn said.

The ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, Mac Thornberry of Texas, praised the agreement for increasing Defense spending -- though he wanted more.

“We cannot underestimate the incredible benefit of funding our troops on time for the second year in a row, something Congress hasn’t done in recent memory,” he said.

Other Republicans ripped it, and many had urged Trump to stick to the spending caps.

Representative Mark Walker of North Carolina made his distaste known by tweeting a picture of The Joker standing in front of a fire.

“With more than $22 trillion in debt, we simply cannot afford deals like this one,” said Representative Mike Johnson, the head of the conservative Republican Study Committee caucus.

For Pelosi, the deal allows her to secure increased domestic spending for two years even though Democrats do not control the Senate or the White House. The roughly $80 billion in savings she agreed to mostly extend policies on Medicare and customs fees rather than representing some new round of fiscal discipline that would be felt by voters. And she nixed a White House attempt to continue budget caps for two years beyond 2021, bringing to an end one of the major accomplishments of the Tea Party era.

Spending Input

The budget agreement will also gives House Democrats a chance to craft 12 annual spending bills with more Democratic input than the party has enjoyed since losing power after the 2010 elections -- albeit with the vague stipulation that they won’t try to put “poison pills” in the bills. Republicans sought assurances that the spending bills won’t expand government funding for abortion and won’t restrict how border security funds can be used.

Pelosi could face resistance from progressives who want to use the budget fight as leverage for assorted stalled liberal priorities, and from more moderate members wary of adding to the nation’s red ink.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell pointedly declined credit for the deal by calling it an agreement between Pelosi and the White House in his statement. Nonetheless, he has a lot to like in the deal.

The Kentucky Republican’s flock includes a handful of senators facing tough re-election fights next year with Democrats needing to win four seats to take control of the chamber. The last thing he wants is another government shutdown or a debt limit debacle, and the agreement avoids that risk.

And should Trump lose in 2020, a Democratic president may need to come to McConnell hat-in-hand to cut a debt deal -- a prospect causing alarm from some Democratic Senate watchers Monday.

“Wait, Dems are going to clear the decks on government funding and debt ceiling for the remainder of Trump’s term, forfeiting all leverage, but set up a major crisis point for Republicans in the first summer of a potential Dem presidents’ term?” tweeted Adam Jentleson, former spokesman for Harry Reid. “This seems like a very bad idea.”

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.